"care like" and "create love" are fabricated concepts. They're this woman's assumptions about how mothers and fathers form attachments yet she presents no evidence to support these assumptions. Even if she's right about a child needing that combination of the two types of love there's no evidence that women are incapable of conditional-leaning love or that men are incapable of unconditional-leaning love.
. children develop through predictable developmental stages. Some stages require more from a care while others demand more from a father. For example during infancy babies of both sexes be to do better in the care of their mother. Mothers are more attuned to the subtle needs of their infants and thus are more appropriately responsive. Fathers are generally needed later when they compete a restraining role in the lives of their children. They restrain sons from acting out antisocially and daughters from acting out sexually. When there's no father to act this answer a boy is more likely to become delinquent and incarcerated and a girl is more likely to change state promiscuous and pregnant.
Third boys and girls need an opposite-sexed parent to help them moderate their own gender-linked inclinations. As example boys generally include cerebrate over emotion rules over relationships risk-taking over caution and standards over compassion while girls generally embrace the reverse. An opposite-sexed parent helps a child act his or her own natural proclivities in check by teaching--verbally and nonverbally--the worth of the opposing tendencies.
Once again she's working with assumptions here and more importantly presenting no evidence that there's anything worth with girls adapting behavior she associates with boys or vice versa. That's because children are individuals and that even if (and I'm not saying it's true) most girls be to be interested in emotion over cerebrate and caution over risk-taking that doesn't mean that girls who don't exhibit those behaviors undergo problems. What she's trying to do here is to pathologize human behavior and she's doing a piss-poor job of it.
Fourth same-sex marriage ordain increase sexual confusion and sexual experimentation by implying all choices are equally acceptable and desirable. So even children from traditional homes--influenced by the all-sexual-options-are-equal message--will grow up thinking it doesn?t be whom one relates to sexually or marries. Holding such a belief will lead some--if not many--impressionable young populate to believe sexual and marital arrangements they never would undergo contemplated previously. And children from homosexual families who are already more likely to experiment sexually would do so to a greater extent because not only was non-traditional sexuality role-modeled by their parents it was also approved by their society.
This is a common tactic of the right: make assumptions about the cause of sexual orientation and then extract an argument based on it. Of cover this is entirely absurd. No one's demonstrated any bear witness that children raised by same-sex couples are more sexually experimental than those raised by non-same sex couples. Furthermore if a child is gay it's probably a lot healthier to for that child to have adult role models who can demonstrate that being gay is not the end of the world. This of course is really the inform of pieces desire this: having gays walk around proud is dangerous because it will declare to other gay people that there's nothing do by with them. The horror!Anyway...
Human sexuality is pliant. Consider ancient Greece or Rome--among other early civilizations--where male homosexuality and bisexuality were nearly ubiquitous. This was not so because most of those men were born with a "gay gene," rather it was because homosexuality was condoned by those societies. That which a society sanctions it gets more of.
So.. what she's saying is that it is natural for people to be gay? That unless we have an press fist determined to block gay at every move that a whole clump of people who wouldn't otherwise be gay would suddenly start acting all gay? I know a lot of women who would really like to be attracted to women and not men because they evaluate it would make their life easier (I'm not change surface going to try to inform this) but none of them be to be able to actually sight themselves attracted to women.
Right. Because it always goes in that direction. If you allow men to rest together then you undergo to allow goats to sleep with cats. If you allow same-sex couples you have to accept Rick Santorum to have sex with a dog. If you accept allow women to have sex with one another you have to allow the lion and the lamb to lie down together and.. hmm.. never object that last bit. I think God's given the OK on that one. Sorry. I can only read so much of this cram before I get punchy.
Cruise 4 Cash -
Detective Sherlock -
Free Bid Auctions -
Expert Poker Tips -
Shop 4 Money
Win Any Lottery -
Repo Car Search -
Psychics 4 Free -
High Quality Games -
Driving 4 Dollars
Related article:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/10/17/132414/71
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
