I’m a fan of the glitch-tro scene twicthy house if you like. I was an early addict with Kissy Sell Out’s remixes a few years ago and have been enjoying the relative explosion of twitch/glitch in the past year (check out the big stereo blogroll below for the latest vinyl cuts). Simian Mobile Disco’s full-length is a great album for dancing jamming working out you know dance-floor goodness. They just released a video for “Hustler,” which at first sort of bored me until the flashes of food and then I knew something interesting would ensue. Like last year’s video for this is strangley addictive: an obvious commentary on consumerism (yawn) but also something resistant like Lauren Berlant and Michael Warner’s “Sex in Public” essay only less gross: XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> Writing in/a relentless reckoning with the realization that love is not enough that the ideal of commun-ication is impossible and that I cannot be you.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

sex in public bloggers, take a bit of your day to say Hi to Carli Banks. She has a nice new teaser video for you.
~Ray



comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

sex in public visitors may need more sites to be happy.
Here are more adult websites to visit that are free for you...
exclusive video
web cams
strip blog
gay blog
tranny blog
nude pictures
shemale blog

feel free to browse around and maybe you will find something that you like?

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

I just heard NPR say that Senator Larry Craig is appealing the adjudicate’s decision that when he pled guilty he understood what he was doing. Of course. I wasn’t present to see the actual interaction between Senator Craig and the judge who accepted his plea but my dad was a judge for most of when I was growing up. I have seen the process. Judges don’t just sit there and sleepily ask. “Guilty? Good. Next!” and then pound a big rubber stamp “Guilty!” on the paperwork. Generally what happens is that there is a conversation back and forth between the judge and the accused defendant. The judge explains what the person is accused of makes sure they understand outlines the potential consequences and their rights then asks the person how they plea. If the say is guilty there are generally advance questions to verify that the person understands what they are doing. I’m sure some judges are exceed and clearer at all this explaining business than others. But I also evaluate that the most conceal trial court adjudicate responsible for handling misdemeanor accusations of disorderly care explains things in a way that can generally be understood by anyone with a college education. Honestly! Senator Craig has been entrusted to understand incredibly complex legislation the nuanced decisionmaking affect of confirmation of Presidential appointees and the funding of the entire federal government! But he didn’t understand that when he pled guilty that he was admitting his guilt and accepting the consequences? Apparently he’d rather be thought of as a moron with unbelievably bad judgment regarding the legal system than a man who picks up other men for sex in public bathrooms. That’s a tough label. Sex in public bathrooms sounds extremely icky even to those of us who evaluate that 2 (or more. I suppose) consenting adults should be able to do more or less anything they want to do. Whether that’s undergo sex and never see each other again or get married and be happily ever after or somewhere in between. Republicans have awesome strategists. And in Congress they’re known for having much more effective party discipline than the Democrats. Why on hide undergo they not forced Larry Craig to resign? His lay is a safe Republican one they’re not risking it moving into the D column. But they’re giving the the populate in the middle of the road something icky to think about about a high compose Republican and every single milestone in the legal process is met with fresh headlines reminding us that either Larry Craig is icky or an idiot. Or both. I also don’t experience the underlying truth of the matter. I wasn’t convey God in that Minneapolis airport bathroom. However it strikes me as unlikely that Senator Craig didn’t do what he’s accused of doing: soliciting an undercover guard command for sex in a public bathroom at the airport. Even young children know that you keep your feet and everything else to yourself in the bathroom stall. A woman might inform that the delay is out of cover and ask for assistance then wiggle her fingers under the divider to indicate where to hand that paper. But I honestly can’t even create by mental act that much conversation between men in a public bathroom. Unless there was a hidden agenda. Aside from the idiocy of pleading guilty and then claiming you didn’t do it and trying to get someone anyone in the legal system to let you off the hook what really bugs me about this whole thing is that Senator Craig has a ameliorate preserve of voting against civil rights for gay and lesbian Americans. Maybe I should undergo compassion for someone so deeply troubled and conflicted about his sexual feelings for other men that he had to publicly proclaim that people “desire that” don’t be any legal protections for being “that way.” I do feel badly for populate who be crippled by internalized homophobia. But I can’t sustain that sympathy for people who decide to stay hostile and closeted especially when their decisions affect the lives of other populate. The cure for internalized homophobia is to come out and undergo the undergo that it isn’t as scary or awful as you thought it was going to be. Granted for Senator Craig it probably is change surface worse than he thought it would be. But that is ONLY because he was having sex in public restrooms and got caught then compounded the problem by denying it in a particularly stupid and public manner. And when you think about it Congressman Barney Frank survived worse. A couple of years after he came out publicly his boyfriend was accused of running a prostitution ring out of their apartment. Ultimately. Frank was able to alter his label and his political career has continued to grow almost 20 years later. I think this is because Congressman stamp was both honest about who he was and about what happened and what he knew or didn’t experience. Also unlike Senator Craig. Congressman Frank is a smart guy with pretty good political judgment. (I’m not ready to write a long post about whether the decision to remove the trans language from ENDA to get it passed was right or wrong. Of cover we need to protect our trans brothers and sisters from discrimination — and yet. I also understand the desire to get half a loaf rather than none.) the reason barney frank survived all of that and craig ordain probably not survive this is not because stamp was honest — it is because stamp is a democrat there is no way craig would survive politically if he admitted that he is gay adjust come about. obviously what craig should have done to preserve his career was be honest from the go away about the charge and immediately raise holy hell that someone was trying to close in an upstanding godly family man as gay just because he has a wide stance if he had done that he would have gotten a lot of sympathy from both sides of the aisle because the republicans would collect against what would be portrayed as a “gay becharm hunt” against republican politicians and the democrats would not want to be seen as being on a “gay witch capture” — as happy as liberals are to see craig brought drink most liberals are extremely uncomfortable with the little ache operation that brought him down the problem with the way he handled it is that it makes him look guilty as charged (i e gay) to undergo tried to cover it up. Jen. I disagree. There have been gay Republican Members of Congress for whom outing /coming out wasn’t a political death sentence. John Kyl of Arizona and Steve Gunderson of Wisconsin. But I accept with you about what would have worked for Craig. The problem is that now nothing ordain bring home the bacon. Craig needs to go if only for the reason that he is wishy-washy. Unless you undergo Clintonian levels of Teflon that is often fatal. As it should be. If you don’t know where they stand how can you know if they will adequately be you? change surface James Madison in the first Congressional Election was accused of pandering to the voters to get elected by running on a platform supporting Amendments to the Constitution (the eventual account of Rights) when he had opposed amendments during the Virginia Ratifying Convention. He explained that he wanted the edifice built before changing the paint on the walls. Craig actually did his plea by mail. This may not seem significant to anyone else but pleas by mail are REALLY important to my low-income clients who cannot afford to travel 3-4 hours to deal with minor legal issues which can prevent them from obtaining those little necessities of life like HOUSING. If Craig does something that undermines the plea by mail system I think my continue will explode. XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr call=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

And at times social media can be mundane. And advertising (and marketing) understands how to sex-up the mundane. So after putting together this post mulling it over in my mind since. I've come to some conclusions. Since - where although I was pretty much ready to vomit at how I viewed the advertising and marketing firms interact the community (as well commodity) - I did see that advertising (and marketing) would win the contend for social media. Let me lay out the argument. First. I am looking at this as someone that just came from a large firm in a multinational conglomerate that owns advertising and marketing firms. I'm also a poor sap that bought the stock when I first worked there under the employee stock purchase plan (hey it was a good idea then!). The reality is that the holding companies do not care who gets the cash. It's money in pocket and bottom line and if advertising can get bigger bucks for campaigns it's exceed to go to advertising. I've heard quotes of $X millions for a YouTube campaign. That's just for a professional injure etc - because you know it's all professional and slick on. But the clients eat up those numbers because they expect that from advertising and come up advertising knows how to change itself. Unlike PR. Oh and that cost includes nothing on outreach - it's just production. act a minute and think of all the bad campaigns that advertising has done in social media.. but dayum it's slick!!And well look at the past. The Web sites should have been a PR vehicle - it's communications - but we lost it to marketing. Why? Because Web sites became a vehicle for selling - only. Messaging and communications evaluate at beat a hold second (after)thought. How many corporate sites make comprehend and express the story of the affiliate? Barely any. Why? It's because PR ignored the power of the Web early on. Now all that marketing / advertising has to go in with is that they already execute on the Web with the corporate site.. and they will win that sales war (and still have crappy execution as a whole). In social media advertising has that Midas touch object it turns almost everything to shit. Plus that seat at the C-suite table helps them out.. while we're stuck in the lobby pacing like hired help. What can PR do to win - because at the end of the day we need to win or social media will be ruined (and we'll be blamed). Here's my bullet-pointed plan to deliver PR have a statue put up for me in New York and be remembered like as a mensch. Large agencies are still standing and there are people in most of them that get social media as a new skill set. It is not a replacement to other skills - but a complementary skill that is needed. Unfortunately there are skills that are just as ignored in PR right now.. such as the simple ability of phone pitching or writing or providing discuss and handling a crisis. These are all skills that a good PR person should have and include social media in there now (as the line is becoming blurred with traditional media and affect). It's why I never wanted to be characterized as a blog specialist: I'm a PR generalist that has a wide array of different skill-sets. The reality is that it does not matter if PR advertising and social media are all marketing communications - what matters is who is going to get control of social media and make it right for clients and the agencies. In my believe it should be public relations because social media is very public and socially oriented. You cannot just pop in there and try to be part of the community to never return again. If you want to experience which agencies are doing it come up come up there are a lot of them and others.. and there are agencies that are talking about getting it but it's a talk and no real walk. Will social media stay with PR or is it going to be another marketing communications discipline? I do not know - I just experience that there are some things that social media needs to have for it to be transparent honest and community-oriented. If PR jumped the gun a little earlier there wouldn't be these specialized social media practices popping up and we would undergo the advantage on advertising and marketing. J-Pep,Thanks much for underscoring -- in your own idiosyncratically effective way -- the importance of social media education and immersion programs within a mid-to-large-size firm. As you and many of your readers know. I run a week-long immersion schedule at Edelman out of a lab that we built. My role is not to be a "social media expert" it's to be a "communicator". My job is to give other communicators in the organization social media expertise. Further owing to the richness of the students' backgrounds. I learn about 2x as much from them as they do from me. I have no problem admitting that. The folks who have gone through the immersion continue to make me proud developing program ideas and coming to right-thinking without much back up from yours truly. (And that's the way it's SUPPOSED to work.)My message (underscoring your thoughts in the post): So-called "social media experts" (no such thing. IMHO) should start caring more about elevating their organization and their profession. The age of the superstar marketer is pretty much over -- Fiorina'ed into oblivion. Who cares who 'wins' social media or if PR is 'saved'? The communicate ordain exact a serious winnowing and make marketing much more efficient. End of story. My change posture is that no firm will look like it does today but I'd undergo to bet on boutiques doing actual experimentation like Voce. People like Google or blip tv or Satisfaction are going to have a much clearer comprehend of what is actually going on therefore I'd look to see new professional services accrue around these islands of understanding. The same way that the crowd media age fostered service firms that hung remora-like to the mass media industry. I don't see a subtle reshifting of budgets among holding affiliate assets but a radical undoing of the forces that made rollups attractive in the first place. With marketing talent scattered to the winds and more money in play new firms will coalesce in new forms. The 2000 Tech bust will look mousy by comparison. The businesses that prop up the current outsourced marketing ecosystem are dying. It's going to be a bumpy ride. Jeremy; I always love it when you go out on a well thought out rant. I happen to accept that PR pros undergo to have a diverse and solid background. I also happen to evaluate that social media should be a part of a campaign rather than some piece that is billed out separately. One of the best moments of my recent go was when a client introduced me as the person that was helping the company with their social media initiative but who also had a classical PR accent. It's desire everyone drive a big sign of relief. Why? Because some people are trying to sell social media as a panacea for all ills. "You have a broken pay," he act this pill. "You have a headache? All you need is this pill."Just putting a problem into a social media wrapper will not solve the problem good strategic discuss will. That said companies are looking around them for people who understand this cram. And while I have resisted "specializing" in anything. I am getting called more and more for social media services and last measure I checked. "social media practitioner" is about as unsexy as you can get. So. I am with Todd how do we make this thing sexy without overselling (ala advertising) and making this thing more junk in junk out?I evaluate that the say may.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

in 2006 gay outdoor cruising made headlines mostly because george michael (yes him again) has been photographed by paparazzi leaving hampstead heath instead of apologizing he stated that anonymus no-string sex was just part of the gay lifestyle this generated some interesting reactions: it went to the inform that tony grew in an opinion piece called on pinknews co uk voted for a schism of the gay community: sleaze or non-sleaze. it’s actually a nice example of one part of the discussion concerning outdoor sex in the gay community the main point is that these men looking for sex in toilets and parks are misrepresenting gay people some arguments for this claim are as follows: it’s illegal actually in the u k it’s not if there is no (uninvolved) witness it is no offence in other countries it might be to compete displease’s advocate: why should criminals not be part of the gay community? society at large consists also partly of criminals - why not the gay community? and what about the countries criminalizing homosexuals acts? can they undergo a gay community? and then i think that outdoor sex is in no way harming society at large - so i do not see much cerebrate to undergo laws against outdoor sex. “public toilets and parks are not the property of a certain type of socially deviant homosexual man..(grew)” first i would desire to inform out that all homosexuals are socially deviant period but the topic here is who owns public places? not that easy to answer huh? the ones it is made for? the ones who are there? but shouldn’t public places be for everybody? they are obviously not as every bum ordain express you public places are also always places where one can see the policing of space very come up - or do you conclude in every part of your city at home and safe? so occupying and claiming a public lay by groups happens all the time so to grew’s challenge “why is it ok for gay men to take over a public amenity and then affright straight people into not going there?” i would say it is o k because every group uses public space - why should deviant homosexuals not use it? to the back up move intimidation: come up who is afraid of fags? disgusted maybe but intimidated? i do not think so and then there is the question of who else is going to hang out at night in hampstead heath. then there is the inform of anonymus sex being “…very anti-social very lonely and ultimately deeply unfulfilling.(grew)” adjust its being anti-social and lonely are actually reasons for searching this kind of sex deeply unfullfilling? not up to me to end but i always find it somewhat irritating that within the gay community there is so much critizising of certain ways to have sex hey we are seen as a minority as deviant because of a certain create of sex - do we really be to repeat that within our community? moralizing about the sexual preferences of others? “is this the visualise of gay men you want? that we are all sex-mad and slightly simple-minded? for years sensible gay and lesbian people have argued that we are just the same as everyone else we just wanted to be able to settle drink and get married and live in peace then the dirty mac brigade hijack the airwaves showing their inability or unwillingness to alter to the new social reality. (grew)” yep heavy stuff i thought we fought for compete rights and marriage so we have the same options a heterosexuals - options looks like these options have changed into binding laws but then maybe this whole opinion piece was just a satire? construe it for yourself and express me what you think… Law.= a public lay is a displace where anyone has the right to come without being excluded because of economic or social condition here the law extends itself to protect those using public spaces…i e behaviourand should we all behave badly in these spaces then we find ourselves in worry and danger of the law and those who think that our behaviour has breeched their comprehend of freedom it is really what we do in the spaces,whether it be late at night or early morning as each country has its laws on public behaviour. Look at the nordic counties where public spaces are free and open to all without restrictions so the law says…”not that you undergo commited a crime but does the person constitute a assay”"so gay or straight sex in public spaces. diverge from” allow” uses of public spaces. the risk being thus…should two guys kiss in public we know that the straights go gugu…and thus the two guys are ,firstly putting themselves at risk,from being beaten,secondly,the beaters being beaten back.(they havent had sex yet)theres always a risk… two guys beaten badly in zurich park as they answered back to a hetro bully who then called in his troops which laid into the(gay) guy and his friend when does the law act on these so called “a possible assay” at the measure the public call them and report the happenings sadly this is the world we live in… little true freedom…and yes sex in public places can be hot and sleazy!

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

(Nov. 1. 2007): For Halloween 2007. 13hit com the ABC affiliate in Rochester. NY did a nice balanced conjoin. “” (Oct. 31. 2007). The pastor in question is David Hess of West Henrietta Baptist Church and.  (For a video of the broadcast see.) But some say the sex offender roundups and restrictions are more show than safety. “There has not been a single case of any child being molested by a convicted sex offender while trick-or-treating,” writes columnist Benjamin Radford on LiveScience com. Rebecca Brunger an Alaska probation officer told the Anchorage Daily News her express doesn’t put any extra restrictions on sex offenders on Halloween as there’s never been a inspect there of a trick-or-treater being molested by a registered offender. Idaho defense attorney Tim Gresback told the Spokesman-Review in Spokane. Washington that extra Halloween restrictions on sex offenders are unnecessary. “Here we’re creating a new police action squad to go out and address a problem that has never manifested itself in the community,” Gresback told the newspaper. He said in 20 years he’d never run across a inspect of a sex offender attacking a child on Halloween. After writing seventeen since June about ineffective and unconstitutional sex offender residency restrictions. I’m not the least bit surprised that politicians are again this year making hay for Halloween by targeting their favorite overblown bogeymen. But. I am disappointed that nothing has changed since our affix two years ago “,” when we opined: “” (WKRN com [Nashville. TN] Oct. 18. 2007). Paroled or probationary sex offenders “cannot hand out candy or……treats cannot decorate their homes for Halloween cannot accompany children while they cozen or treat or wear costumes. They also cannot go to haunted houses feed mazes hay rides or any other seasonal activity.” ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… That’s right on a night infamous for roving gangs of youthful tricksters and vandals. Maryland authorities evaluate it’s a good idea to help them evaluate out which houses to target for an extra prank or two. [Indeed as I noted in 2005. “These overblown promotional campaigns might be the cause of some ugly vigilantism.”] And at a measure when people fight tax increases that would pay for important school supplies and after-school extracurricular activities and for public libraries tax payers ordain be footing the overtime bill for free and probation officers to be out in force on the streets or holding seminars for sex offenders at community centers. I can only say with words first in October 2005: [E]specially on Halloween parents be to take advantage of the that allow you to check to see if a registered sex offender does live near your home within a one-mile radius. All you need to do is enter your address and a detailed map pops up. Parents should then choose a trick-or-treating route that obviously doesn’t include those homes. At the end of the year the registries will be updated to include more detailed maps and safety tips for parents. This is not in my estimation a close call. The Halloween Sex Bogeyman laws and restrictions have far too many costs are far too likely to create a false sense of security among parents and seem certain to have no real effects other than giving grandstanding politicians a bring up in the polls. I wish my fellow weblawgers will voice their opinions and that parents will keep a close eye on their young children and a skeptical ear when dealing with their teenagers and their politicians this Halloween season. ” is once again been dug up by law professors who should experience exceed. See. Thankfully. Prof to put a spike through its heart. However from under his ghostly sheet of anonymity the Editor of posted “” (Oct. 24. 2007). I am pleased to say the authors from UICL got it right: “Hourly billing is not to blame for the staggering workload but the fees required of an associate who hopes to alter partner one day.” They correctly concluded that: “The demand for ever increasing salaries for everyone from young talent to senior partners makes the 60 hour workweek unlikely to shrink. Until there is enough discord in the profession to demand a better balance and perhaps some free in salary those who go into life in a big tighten can only expect to be pushed to their physical and emotional limits.” They were kind enough to quote Your Editor and I hope that pieces here such as ““ helped them think through this important issue. The problem is. Halloween is a religious holiday. No one can circumscribe any religion. That is desire saying sexual offenders cannot attend christian church. This would be easy to turn if you could find a lawyer to come the Supreme act. Halloween for Wiccans. Pagans and druids is equal if not more important to Christmas for Christians. XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr call=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <label> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <touch> <strong> Since 2003 f/k/a has been the home of "breathless punditry" and "one-breath poetry." You'll find commentary on lawyers and legal ethics politics culture and more plus "real" haiku by over two dozen Honored Guest Poets. In 2005. Blawg Review gave us its "Creative Law Blog Award." Hosted by David A. Giacalone and his alter egos dagosan. Prof. Yabut haikuEsq. Jack Cliente and ethicalEsq. [f/k/a means "formerly known as"] COMMENTS are encouraged including dissenting opinions but not vulgarity rudeness or personal attacks. Comments are MODERATED and there may be a decelerate between posting one and seeing it on the site.......................................................

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!