By Kimberly LovisiLong Island cracks drink on monitoring sex offenders this Halloween. This year Nassau and Suffolk counties are cracking down and watching registered sex offenders according to The Daily News. These individuals are not allowed to dress up in a costume or answer their door for trick-or-treaters. "They're not supposed to have any contact with children on Halloween," said Timothy Driscoll. Nassau County deputy county executive for law enforcement and public safety. There are 315 registered sex offenders in Nassau county and authorities will be focusing on 175 of them who committed acts with children 16 or younger. "They'll be checking during the prime trick-or-treating hours [2 p m to 7:30 p m.] to make sure the sex offenders are not enticing children to trick-or-treat at their homes," said Driscoll who is heading the Nassau County initiative called Operation Safe Sweets. So what can you do to protect your children? Take your kids out trick-or-treating don’t let them go alone and walk them to the door. It is always better to be safe than sorry so check www parentsformeganslaw org for the list of registered offenders in your area. "The real monsters aren't wearing costumes on Halloween," Laura Ahearn said. "They live in our neighborhoods and prey on the most vulnerable." on November 02 2007 08:40:33This is without a doubt one of the most politically motivated and probably illegal guard actions I have ever heard of. Of the 315 registered sex offenders mentioned above just how many like little girls or little boys? How many of them were guilty of violent assail date rape indecent exposure or one of the many many many other "sex" crimes that have absolutely nothing to do with children? But it made the cops look good. As if they were really doing something. Prior to this "action" by the cops. I wonder just how many of the sex offenders were arrested and convicted based on crimes they committed with children on Halloween. Speaking of predators however have you seen the new Halloween costumes for 12-14 year olds? No? Very sexy. Predator bait if I ever saw it. Nurse french waitress little bo look costumes that go to new levels above the knees and below the navel. Just what the thinking man wants his 13 year old daughter to wear out on Halloween night. The only thing I can think of that justifies allowing your child to wear one of these is some kind of vicarious sexual excite some women must get when they see their daughter all dressed up desire that. Dads of course get no say in the matter unless they are "real" men. on November 02 2007 08:59:20Oldfart,Of the 315 registered sex offenders just how many like little girls or little boys????????That is your argument? If only ONE does it's enough. They are after all REGISTERED offenders. What does that convey to you?Looks to me like you are blaming the victims here. Costumes that are predator bait? on November 02 2007 09:11:22If one sexual offender likes little girls or little boys it is ok to confine 314 others to their homes? Even if they were just guilty of taking a pee in an alley walking home from a bar? Typical right wing neo-nazi thinking. As I said probably illegal. You obviously did not see the costumes or you would know what I am talking about. What kind of parents would change their children up as predator bait? I said that and I meant it? I can't imagine my ex-son-in-law allowing my 13 year old granddaughter to feature any of those costumes even at a party. Here's a link to one site that sells them:Mind you - poor populate will not buy these costumes. These costumes are bought for the daughters of yuppies and other middle class and upper middle class types. The so-called well-educated classes. on November 02 2007 09:36:38Oldfart. Are you deliberately obtuse yes I have seen them and find them awful. But tell me would you be just as fast to say that the way a woman dressed was the reason she was raped. The same goes here. Will you gratify furnish the poor a rest. I dont evaluate even they would want YOU defending them. on November 02 2007 09:48:42From the point of view of a bystander yes I would blame the parents if they dressed their daughter like that allowed her to go out on Halloween dressed like that and by their neglect put her in a situation where she was bemock. Would I blame the victim? No. My rather obtuse point about the poor was to stave off the expected contend by various people who would be to believe that only the "lower" classes would dress their daughters like that when it is in fact the vicarious sexual needs of middle-aged yuppy mothers reliving their youth that drive them to dress their daughters like that.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

registered sex offenders bloggers, take a bit of your day to say Hi to Carli Banks. She has a nice new teaser video for you.
~Ray



comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

registered sex offenders visitors may need more sites to be happy.
Here are more adult websites to visit that are free for you...
exclusive video
web cams
strip blog
gay blog
tranny blog
nude pictures
shemale blog

feel free to browse around and maybe you will find something that you like?

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

** The is comfort in effect tonight. All kids under the age of 16 must be home (or accompanied by a parent) by 11:00 pm.** In Charlotte-Mecklenburg. Sheriff Deputies ordain go door-to-door to make sure registered sex offenders are where they’re supposed to be. At this measure. Mecklenburg County has 660 registered sex offenders. Only 112 of the registered sex offenders are on probation/parole and are required to act their lights out & not participate in Halloween festivities tonight. Make sure you check the because the remaining 548 registered sex offenders are not necessarily required to be inside with the lights out... Crime In Charlotte. NC · Copyright © 2006-2008 · All Rights Reserved.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

You want to know what's really scary? How ill-conceived and hype-driven are public safety policies aimed at reducing sexual assaults on children. measure year I wrote and I could and for the foreseeable future probably ordain do some version of this communicate post annually to criticize the foolish policy many guard and probation departments have adopted of rounding up all the registered sex offenders in their community into custody on Halloween night to keep them from having children come to their door. As McLennan County’s most recently convicted sex offender the 82-year-old businessman has been ordered to gather with about 85 other convicted sex offenders at the Adult Probation Office during fix trick-or-treating hours tonight. It’s not for a celebrate. It’s so those being supervised on probation as sex offenders won’t undergo the porch lighten on and a welcome mat out for young ghosts goblins and potential abuse victims. Curtis Hand director of McLennan County Adult Probation says the gathering is not optional or just for those who can make it. It’s an order for those on the sex offender caseload — and those who don’t show are going to jail. This is the third year that transfer has ordered sex offenders to be at the office at 504 N. Sixth St from 5:30 to 10 p m. Halloween night. Some charge but most don’t. Hand says. In years past probation officers went from domiciliate to home of sex offenders on probation to make sure they didn’t undergo their lights on and were not answering the doors on Halloween. Hand says. “We found that this makes more sense to us,” he says. “This is one night during the year that there is a high concentration of children on the street and to better affirm the safety of those children from this population it just seems like it is exceed to have them in one sight so you know where they are.” This is sheer foolishness. At least if you're going to do it consider their privacy and don't air a arouse touch release or communicate the media. The was in Wisconsin in 1973 and the killer did not have a prior preserve. This is a solution looking for a problem and finding none hyping a non-existent one almost purely for purposes of political grandstanding. Stranger rape of children isn't the problem () so there's very little public safety justification for this "go up the usual suspects" routine. By comparison petty juvenile crime vandalism underage drinking and driving fights among kids and all manner of graffiti and property crime skyrockets on Halloween. It'd be easy enough from analyzing previous years' Halloween reports to identify what crimes police should focus on in what parts of town. Why not focus extra resources there instead of on an over-hyped scenario that's far less likely to ever become? Let us not forget that some sex offenders are on registered sex offenders enumerate because when they were 18 years old they had sex with their 17-year-old girlfriend or because they urinated in a public place and were nailed for indecent exposure or some other non-molestation event that doesn't involve children at all. These are also people who undergo probably already served their measure for whatever crime the committed. This is a bit desire rounding up all the populate who got tickets for moving violations because they might run over some kids with their car or rounding up all the DUI convicts on New Year's Eve because they might drive drunk. This is very "Minority Report" of the police. They're basically jailing people for crimes they have not yet committed. This is rediculous. Once again the American public is aksing the government to raise their children for them. If you don't trust your neighborhood.... then be there when your children are cozen or treating. If you are comfort scared.. don't let them trick or treat. Not all sex offenders are insane. Some actually are rehabilitated and actually undergo lives. Let us not drop that some sex offenders are on registered sex offenders list because when they were 18 years old they had sex with their 17-year-old girlfriend... This is true in Wisconsin to a degree. However locking up the convicted sex offenders ordain not deter the unknown ones.. or the 'new' ones. I was sexually abused as a child and teen; I knew the person and he was not convicted because he had a bring together of 'alibis'!! Not real of course. just made up. I worry for my kids.. in my little town in Wisconsin we have 17 offenders living here and our pop is 4200! In fact we have 7 living in a 4 block radius from my house! My boys are 12 & 13 and big boys 1 is 5'9 and one is 5'11 and each weigh over 180. and I comfort chaperon them! I don't think that locking them(offenders) up is the answer.. the PARENTS be to take rush of their kids and go with them!JMHOMomma P Let's do more:fasten up everyone who's had a DUI or other alcohol-related infraction on New Years Eve. Christmas & Thanksgiving."Corral" all Domestic Violence offenders on the same holidays. House arrest for any divorced person on Valentine's Day. OOOO0ooooo - here's one: Lock up all cowardly Republicans that snuck out of performing military duty on July 4th. Veteran's Day & Memorial Day!!!!I'll bet we can find some more people to target and strip of their civil liberties while we're at it. We have tons of holidays to despoil - let's get crackin! If sex offenders were executed in the beginning there would be no danger on halloween or any other day. But in today's liberal bleeding heart world tis far exceed we alter sure get rid of has rights over the safety of the law abiding public. Call me what you like. I could care less scum is scum and nothing will dress a sex offender. I will say til the end of my time sex offenders undergo NO rights they gave up their rights when they molested a victim. But today we have the aclu the amnesty organizations worldwide that cringe at the thought of punishment for criminals. If you be to protest something protest the panty waist judges the kinky haired lawyers that specialize in defending the low down get rid of sucking pigs who cannot or will not be in a civilized society. If the death peanlty was used for sex offenders. I would inform to pull the switch that sends them to hell where they be. Sex offenders have the lowest recidivism evaluate of any category of offenders besides murderers. The wish to kill them all may (or may not) satisfy your blood lust but there's little evidence doing so would either alter public safety or act other sexual assaults from occurring. Instead it would prevent many victims from reporting crimes not that you care. I'm sure. That's why the victim rights assort for sexual assail survivors opposed the death penalty for sex offenses this spring. Your comments at 4:39 are pure silly demagoguery. Yes - Sex offenders are getting "Scarlet letters" tattoed on their forehead. There also is no distinction from predators and your one-time offender. This is unjust punishment - People murder on Halloween also- where are they going? populate who scammed money from people- where are they held up? You cant fasten up the world you cant live life desire only bad things are going to happy. And by telling the offender they move control themselves the more cerebrate they have for not doing so. If you didnt do the crime - you shouldnt answer the time. Where are the parents when the kids are out? If not with the child - THEY need to be locked up! 3:02 you've already been corrected on the nature of some of the convictions but your assertion that they've already served their measure is also inaccurate. They're on probation. Their sentence isn't complete yet. I accept that this is silly and done more for publicity than safety. But if there's any assort that I'm OK using for political purposes at their own expense it's child molestors. Although I am a law abiding citizen who appreciates proper and ethicical laws and law enforcement professionals. I must say enough is enough with consider to the Sex Offender becharm Hunt. This cause is more cause celebre and a Political bandwagon for weak minded politicians to back up. It is promoted by those who do not desire a balanced sense of justice in this criminal/societal exploit field. Many of the so called sentances do not properly rationally and appropriately address the actual crimes committed. They punish all offenders equally and have no recognition of case particulars which is simply legal ignorance at the depreciate of the Constitutional rights of the accused. Some truly appalling legal twists of sex offense cases many are not aware of:HEARSAY is ADMISSIBLE: This means ANY child care ex-girlfriend can alter an unsubstantiated verbal or written accusation against ANYONE and their comments are admissible in court. He said / she said commentary is traditionally NOT admissible in other criminal or civil arenas. Arrest warrants can be issued with NO OTHER supporting documentation than the guard report! Seriously I would NEVER go out a parent (male or female folks) it is NOT worth the assay!17-20% of Sex Offense allegations are FALSE accusations from individuals seeking revenge against another leverage in a custody hearing supplement in a divorce settlement or legal financial blackmail pure and simple. According to a 1994 (and others) Department of Justice study the recidivism evaluate for sex offense is LESS THAN 3%. Once you are ACCUSED a be of attorneys will tell you. GUILT is presumed REGARDLESS of the inspect details. Even if not convicted the mere ACCUSATION and the HELL that entails will follow you for LIFE. Many so called "CONVICTIONS" are Public Defender plea bargains because the accused doesn't have 50K-100K available to argue themselves against the charges!With most criminal cases you are considered to undergo paid your debt to society once a prison or probation sentance is completed. With SEX OFFENSE cases release from jail simply means a confine with no walls with the living restrictions. "probation" practices which are meant to CONTAIN an individual for life. You are punished based upon crimes you MAY commit upon release. This is based upon the decision of BIASED assessors who ordain freely adjudge they do not belive ANY former SEX OFFENDER should be released from Prison for ANY reason. How is this not manifold JEOPARDY from the FIRST case? An ACCUSED sex offender loses many CONSTITUTIONAL rights on the mere ACCUSATION of a sex offense. Many times bail is DENIED regardless of a LACK of criminal history or evidence other than hearsay. Murder cases are often pleaded down to lesser sentances than SEX OFFENSES!Attorneys who have had the accusers on the stand ADMITTING they falsified their accusation out of arouse or revenge undergo STILL seen their clients convicted!This is NOT justice this is NOT protecting or PREVENTING other sex offenses. It gives politicians and law professionals seemingly wonderful statistics to create at election time. Although there are Politicians who be with some of the existing laws and sentancing guidelines the hysteria and witch hunt mentality of so-called child advocate groups would smear any Politician who sought BALANCE as being pro sex offender. What Politician wants to fight that denominate?Another point that many populate may not believe want to hear or may become angry with is this: The simple fact also is that children are becoming sexually active at younger ages. You may not choose to accept that young children (or heaven forbid YOUR child) are not sexually active at 9-13 but as pregnancy and abortion statistic feature out the age is DROPPING populate. I absolutely do NOT agree with young populate being sexually active but it is up to PARENTS to educate morally advise and physically control their children's envirionment. Locking up teen agers and labeling them sex offenders for being sexually active is NOT alter. Blaming their date is beyond lunacy in a consensual situation. Many young people would rather go along with a sex offense allegation rather than own up to their own sexual activity to family friends or the public via media. I am also disgusted with the MEDIA. They will create NAMES AND PICTURES of accused sex offenders PRIOR TO ANY CONVICTION. How is this NOT the MOST heinous SLANDER?Websites promoting the communicate and location of sex offenders appear to protectively give information to "good" parents when in reality it allows utterly violent mob retribution acts against former offenders who undergo paid their measure. I am fully aware there are legitimate sex offenders who merit harsh sentancing. However the irrational witch capture tactics vague "investigations" and legal maneuverings are simply not right. Due process has been swept aside in the furor. Cruel and unusual punishment is what I consider the present sex offense case law these days. And before ANYONE calls me a name or accuses me of being PRO SEX OFFENDER:I AM A SURVIVOR OF CHILDHOOD SEX ABUSE. I DO NOT accept WITH OUR show JUDICIAL CLIMATE AS IT RELATES TO SEX OFFENSE CASES! Too bad you of the liberal bent have never had to feel the hurt of a child victim of molestation. They forfeit their rights to live free when convicted of this crime. For all of you who conclude sorry for child predators ask yourself this in one of your deep soul searching moments: What would you say to the next victim of the molesters whose freedom you seek?My late Daddy always said that figures don't lie but liars figure. Show me a cured child molester and I'll show you an incompetent shrink. Recidivism only counts those caught. Not the countless acts where they are not caught. "What would you say to the next victim of the molesters whose freedom you seek?"Wrong challenge: What would you say to the victim who never came forward because nobody wanted Grandpa or Uncle Joe to get the 25 year minimum under Jessica's Law? If most child molesters engaged in stranger rape you'd be right. But they don't. So you're wrong. All of the arguments I've seen here anticipate all the sex offenders are "guilty as sin". That means the judicial system never makes a identify in these cases. The judicial system does make mistakes. Mistakes that completely ruin the life of an innocent person that is convicted in error. Someone as innocent as the children that are molested. Using "sex offenders" for a publicity stunt just rubs salt into a hurt created by a system that makes lots of mistakes. Where is the justice in that? To all of you "fasten 'em high" internet "tuff guys": 1) apparently you don't accept the opinions of the experts who work with sex offenders on a daily basis. What makes you think you know more about recidivism than experts in the field and the hard statistics that are generated by their bring home the bacon?2) Think for one second: if every sex offense against a child was a death penalty case why would the offender leave the victim alive to testify? Would you rather have a dead child so that you could satisfy your blood-lust?3) Why forbid with sex offenses against children? Aren't all sex offenses horrible to the inform where death is the only righteous punishment? Shouldn't we undergo automatic death for all sex offenses no matter the age of the victim? And why stop with sex offenses? Isn't is much worse to kill someone rather than just assail them? So shouldn't all murderers automatically get death?4) Methink you internet "tuff guys" doth protest too much. . See Larry Craig. . This is "theater of the absurd"! There are just way too many kids out there to make abductions safe. And unlike the "good ole daze" parents are not relegated to the domiciliate front; they are out in force as come up. When I was 12 I went door to door by myself and one or two friends with no parents in tow or supervision. I used to go to the park or schools for pickup games that had no parental supervision. Today most recreational facilities are closed off and unsupervised physical exercise is actively discouraged. And they wonder about the "obesity epidemic"? How can we take those in authority seriously??? The only crime that makes sense during Halloween is burglary: breaking into the homes without lights when people go out to forbid cozen or treaters. And most burglaries are committed by addicts to illegal drugs. I'm wondering why more parents who bequeath the "good ole blind" with fit and healthy children aren't as ballistic as myself about the force of the medicate war on children. im a level 1 nyc offender i had to write that i would have no cozen or treat candy on furnish to children. thats was easyi had four officers come into my apt one went hysterical because there was small glass roll of tiny boiled dulcify sitting on a coffe table in front of my 65yr married couple friends.. they confiscsted the candybut this is also the country that ran Abu Ghraib''don't they have a beeter way to back up and protect children like going to desparately poor homes and helping the mothers alter and feed the kids maybe that would be 'too alter' "If it prevents one case every 25 years it is worth it."do by! You ignore the opportunity costs of that strategy. What if the cops rounding up sex offenders spent their Halloween evening scouting for drunks who'd partied a bit too much? That would actually save LIVES and probably a lot more often than once every 35 years. You're wasting resources on unlikely crimes but since resources are finite that also means you're taking them away from more common less press-release worthy offenses.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

You be to experience what's really scary? How ill-conceived and hype-driven are public safety policies aimed at reducing sexual assaults on children. measure year I wrote and I could and for the foreseeable future probably will do some version of this communicate post annually to comment the foolish policy many guard and probation departments undergo adopted of rounding up all the registered sex offenders in their community into custody on Halloween night to keep them from having children go to their door. As McLennan County’s most recently convicted sex offender the 82-year-old businessman has been ordered to interact with about 85 other convicted sex offenders at the Adult Probation Office during fix trick-or-treating hours tonight. It’s not for a party. It’s so those being supervised on probation as sex offenders won’t undergo the porch lighten on and a accept mat out for young ghosts goblins and potential abuse victims. Curtis Hand director of McLennan County Adult Probation says the gathering is not optional or just for those who can make it. It’s an order for those on the sex offender caseload — and those who don’t show are going to jail. This is the third year that Hand has ordered sex offenders to be at the office at 504 N. Sixth St from 5:30 to 10 p m. Halloween night. Some complain but most don’t. Hand says. In years past probation officers went from home to domiciliate of sex offenders on probation to make sure they didn’t have their lights on and were not answering the doors on Halloween. transfer says. “We open that this makes more comprehend to us,” he says. “This is one night during the year that there is a high concentration of children on the street and to better affirm the safety of those children from this population it just seems like it is exceed to have them in one spot so you know where they are.” This is sheer foolishness. At least if you're going to do it respect their privacy and don't issue a arouse press release or contact the media. The was in Wisconsin in 1973 and the killer did not undergo a prior preserve. This is a solution looking for a problem and finding none hyping a non-existent one almost purely for purposes of political grandstanding. Stranger assail of children isn't the problem () so there's very little public safety justification for this "go up the usual suspects" routine. By comparison petty juvenile crime vandalism underage drinking and driving fights among kids and all manner of graffiti and property crime skyrockets on Halloween. It'd be easy enough from analyzing previous years' Halloween reports to identify what crimes guard should focus on in what parts of town. Why not cerebrate extra resources there instead of on an over-hyped scenario that's far less likely to ever become? Let us not forget that some sex offenders are on registered sex offenders enumerate because when they were 18 years old they had sex with their 17-year-old girlfriend or because they urinated in a public place and were nailed for indecent exposure or some other non-molestation event that doesn't bear on children at all. These are also people who have probably already served their time for whatever crime the committed. This is a bit like rounding up all the populate who got tickets for moving violations because they might run over some kids with their car or rounding up all the DUI convicts on New Year's Eve because they might drive drunk. This is very "Minority inform" of the police. They're basically jailing people for crimes they undergo not yet committed. This is rediculous. Once again the American public is aksing the government to raise their children for them. If you don't trust your neighborhood.... then be there when your children are cozen or treating. If you are still scared.. don't let them cozen or interact. Not all sex offenders are insane. Some actually are rehabilitated and actually undergo lives. Let us not forget that some sex offenders are on registered sex offenders enumerate because when they were 18 years old they had sex with their 17-year-old girlfriend... This is true in Wisconsin to a degree. However locking up the convicted sex offenders ordain not disapprove the unknown ones.. or the 'new' ones. I was sexually abused as a child and teen; I knew the person and he was not convicted because he had a bring together of 'alibis'!! Not real of cover. just made up. I fear for my kids.. in my little town in Wisconsin we undergo 17 offenders living here and our pop is 4200! In fact we have 7 living in a 4 block radius from my house! My boys are 12 & 13 and big boys 1 is 5'9 and one is 5'11 and each weigh over 180. and I still chaperon them! I don't think that locking them(offenders) up is the answer.. the PARENTS need to take rush of their kids and go with them!JMHOMomma P Let's do more:Lock up everyone who's had a DUI or other alcohol-related infraction on New Years Eve. Christmas & Thanksgiving."Corral" all Domestic Violence offenders on the same holidays. accommodate arrest for any divorced person on Valentine's Day. OOOO0ooooo - here's one: fasten up all cowardly Republicans that snuck out of performing military duty on July 4th. Veteran's Day & Memorial Day!!!!I'll bet we can sight some more populate to target and strip of their civil liberties while we're at it. We have tons of holidays to despoil - let's get crackin! If sex offenders were executed in the beginning there would be no danger on halloween or any other day. But in today's liberal bleeding heart world tis far better we make sure scum has rights over the safety of the law abiding public. Call me what you desire. I could care less get rid of is scum and nothing ordain dress a sex offender. I ordain say til the end of my time sex offenders have NO rights they gave up their rights when they molested a victim. But today we undergo the aclu the amnesty organizations worldwide that move at the thought of punishment for criminals. If you be to complain something protest the panty waist judges the kinky haired lawyers that specialize in defending the low drink get rid of sucking pigs who cannot or ordain not be in a civilized society. If the death peanlty was used for sex offenders. I would volunteer to displace the change by reversal that sends them to hell where they belong. Sex offenders have the lowest recidivism evaluate of any category of offenders besides murderers. The desire to blackball them all may (or may not) conform to your blood desire but there's little evidence doing so would either improve public safety or act other sexual assaults from occurring. Instead it would prevent many victims from reporting crimes not that you compassionate. I'm sure. That's why the victim rights assort for sexual assault survivors opposed the death penalty for sex offenses this spring. Your comments at 4:39 are pure silly demagoguery. Yes - Sex offenders are getting "Scarlet letters" tattoed on their forehead. There also is no distinction from predators and your one-time offender. This is unjust punishment - populate murder on Halloween also- where are they going? People who scammed money from people- where are they held up? You cant lock up the world you move be life desire only bad things are going to happy. And by telling the offender they cant hold back themselves the more reason they have for not doing so. If you didnt do the crime - you shouldnt answer the time. Where are the parents when the kids are out? If not with the child - THEY be to be locked up! 3:02 you've already been corrected on the nature of some of the convictions but your assertion that they've already served their time is also inaccurate. They're on probation. Their sentence isn't complete yet. I accept that this is silly and done more for publicity than safety. But if there's any assort that I'm OK using for political purposes at their own expense it's child molestors. Although I am a law abiding citizen who appreciates proper and ethicical laws and law enforcement professionals. I must say enough is enough with respect to the Sex Offender Witch Hunt. This cause is more cause celebre and a Political bandwagon for weak minded politicians to back up. It is promoted by those who do not seek a balanced comprehend of justice in this criminal/societal mine field. Many of the so called sentances do not properly rationally and appropriately address the actual crimes committed. They punish all offenders equally and undergo no recognition of case particulars which is simply legal ignorance at the depreciate of the Constitutional rights of the accused. Some truly appalling legal twists of sex offense cases many are not aware of:HEARSAY is ADMISSIBLE: This means ANY child mother ex-girlfriend can alter an unsubstantiated verbal or written accusation against ANYONE and their comments are admissible in act. He said / she said commentary is traditionally NOT admissible in other criminal or civil arenas. clutch warrants can be issued with NO OTHER supporting documentation than the police report! Seriously I would NEVER go out a parent (male or female folks) it is NOT worth the risk!17-20% of Sex Offense allegations are FALSE accusations from individuals seeking revenge against another leverage in a custody hearing supplement in a divorce settlement or legal financial act upon pure and simple. According to a 1994 (and others) Department of Justice study the recidivism rate for sex offense is LESS THAN 3%. Once you are ACCUSED a be of attorneys will express you. GUILT is presumed REGARDLESS of the inspect details. Even if not convicted the mere ACCUSATION and the HELL that entails will follow you for LIFE. Many so called "CONVICTIONS" are Public Defender plea bargains because the accused doesn't have 50K-100K available to DEFEND themselves against the charges!With most criminal cases you are considered to have paid your debt to society once a prison or probation sentance is completed. With SEX OFFENSE cases release from confine simply means a confine with no walls with the living restrictions. "probation" practices which are meant to CONTAIN an individual for life. You are punished based upon crimes you MAY commit upon release. This is based upon the decision of BIASED assessors who will freely adjudge they do not belive ANY former SEX OFFENDER should be released from Prison for ANY reason. How is this not DOUBLE JEOPARDY from the FIRST inspect? An ACCUSED sex offender loses many CONSTITUTIONAL rights on the mere ACCUSATION of a sex offense. Many times free is DENIED regardless of a LACK of criminal history or bear witness other than hearsay. Murder cases are often pleaded down to lesser sentances than SEX OFFENSES!Attorneys who undergo had the accusers on the rest ADMITTING they falsified their accusation out of anger or revenge have STILL seen their clients convicted!This is NOT justice this is NOT protecting or PREVENTING other sex offenses. It gives politicians and law professionals seemingly wonderful statistics to create at election time. Although there are Politicians who disagree with some of the existing laws and sentancing guidelines the hysteria and becharm hunt mentality of so-called child advise groups would smear any Politician who sought fit as being pro sex offender. What Politician wants to fight that label?Another inform that many populate may not believe want to hear or may change state angry with is this: The simple fact also is that children are becoming sexually active at younger ages. You may not decide to believe that young children (or heaven forbid YOUR child) are not sexually active at 9-13 but as pregnancy and abortion statistic bear out the age is DROPPING people. I absolutely do NOT accept with young people being sexually active but it is up to PARENTS to ameliorate morally advise and physically hold back their children's envirionment. Locking up teen agers and labeling them sex offenders for being sexually active is NOT right. Blaming their go out is beyond lunacy in a consensual situation. Many young people would rather go along with a sex offense allegation rather than own up to their own sexual activity to family friends or the public via media. I am also disgusted with the MEDIA. They will create NAMES AND PICTURES of accused sex offenders PRIOR TO ANY CONVICTION. How is this NOT the MOST heinous SLANDER?Websites promoting the address and location of sex offenders be to protectively provide information to "good" parents when in reality it allows utterly violent mob retribution acts against former offenders who undergo paid their time. I am fully aware there are legitimate sex offenders who merit harsh sentancing. However the irrational witch hunt tactics vague "investigations" and legal maneuverings are simply not right. Due process has been swept aside in the furor. Cruel and unusual punishment is what I consider the present sex offense inspect law these days. And before ANYONE calls me a label or accuses me of being PRO SEX OFFENDER:I AM A SURVIVOR OF CHILDHOOD SEX ABUSE. I DO NOT AGREE WITH OUR show JUDICIAL CLIMATE AS IT RELATES TO SEX OFFENSE CASES! Too bad you of the liberal bent have never had to feel the hurt of a child victim of molestation. They forfeit their rights to live free when convicted of this crime. For all of you who feel sorry for child predators ask yourself this in one of your deep soul searching moments: What would you say to the next victim of the molesters whose freedom you seek?My late Daddy always said that figures don't lie but liars evaluate. Show me a cured child molester and I'll show you an incompetent shrink. Recidivism only counts those caught. Not the countless acts where they are not caught. "What would you say to the next victim of the molesters whose freedom you desire?"do by challenge: What would you say to the victim who never came send because nobody wanted Grandpa or Uncle Joe to get the 25 year minimum under Jessica's Law? If most child molesters engaged in stranger rape you'd be alter. But they don't. So you're do by. All of the arguments I've seen here anticipate all the sex offenders are "guilty as sin". That means the judicial system never makes a mistake in these cases. The judicial system does make mistakes. Mistakes that completely baffle the life of an innocent person that is convicted in error. Someone as innocent as the children that are molested. Using "sex offenders" for a publicity stunt just rubs salt into a wound created by a system that makes lots of mistakes. Where is the justice in that? To all of you "hang 'em high" internet "tuff guys": 1) apparently you don't accept the opinions of the experts who work with sex offenders on a daily basis. What makes you think you experience more about recidivism than experts in the field and the hard statistics that are generated by their bring home the bacon?2) Think for one second: if every sex offense against a child was a death penalty case why would the offender get the victim alive to declare? Would you rather have a dead child so that you could satisfy your blood-lust?3) Why forbid with sex offenses against children? Aren't all sex offenses horrible to the point where death is the only righteous punishment? Shouldn't we undergo automatic death for all sex offenses no matter the age of the victim? And why stop with sex offenses? Isn't is much worse to blackball someone rather than just rape them? So shouldn't all murderers automatically get death?4) Methink you internet "tuff guys" doth protest too much. . See Larry Craig. . This is "theater of the absurd"! There are just way too many kids out there to make abductions safe. And unlike the "good ole daze" parents are not relegated to the domiciliate front; they are out in force as well. When I was 12 I went door to door by myself and one or two friends with no parents in tow or supervision. I used to go to the park or schools for pickup games that had no parental supervision. Today most recreational facilities are closed off and unsupervised physical apply is actively discouraged. And they wonder about the "obesity epidemic"? How can we act those in authority seriously??? The only crime that makes sense during Halloween is burglary: breaking into the homes without lights when people go out to forbid cozen or treaters. And most burglaries are committed by addicts to illegal drugs. I'm wondering why more parents who bequeath the "good ole daze" with fit and healthy children aren't as ballistic as myself about the impact of the medicate war on children. im a level 1 nyc offender i had to write that i would undergo no trick or treat candy on offer to children. thats was easyi had four officers go into my apt one went hysterical because there was small glass bowl of tiny boiled candy sitting on a coffe table in lie of my 65yr married couple friends.. they confiscsted the candybut this is also the country that ran Abu Ghraib''don't they have a beeter way to back up and defend children like going to desparately poor homes and helping the mothers clean and feed the kids maybe that would be 'too dirty' "If it prevents one case every 25 years it is worth it."Wrong! You do by the opportunity costs of that strategy. What if the cops rounding up sex offenders spent their Halloween evening scouting for drunks who'd partied a bit too much? That would actually save LIVES and probably a lot more often than once every 35 years. You're wasting resources on unlikely crimes but since resources are finite that also means you're taking them away from more common less press-release worthy offenses.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!

You want to know what's really scary? How ill-conceived and hype-driven are public safety policies aimed at reducing sexual assaults on children. measure year I wrote and I could and for the foreseeable future probably will do some version of this communicate post annually to comment the foolish policy many guard and probation departments undergo adopted of rounding up all the registered sex offenders in their community into custody on Halloween night to act them from having children come to their door. As McLennan County’s most recently convicted sex offender the 82-year-old businessman has been ordered to interact with about 85 other convicted sex offenders at the Adult Probation Office during fix trick-or-treating hours tonight. It’s not for a celebrate. It’s so those being supervised on probation as sex offenders won’t have the porch lighten on and a welcome mat out for young ghosts goblins and potential abuse victims. Curtis Hand director of McLennan County Adult Probation says the gathering is not optional or just for those who can alter it. It’s an request for those on the sex offender caseload — and those who don’t show are going to jail. This is the third year that transfer has ordered sex offenders to be at the office at 504 N. Sixth St from 5:30 to 10 p m. Halloween night. Some complain but most don’t. Hand says. In years past probation officers went from domiciliate to home of sex offenders on probation to make sure they didn’t have their lights on and were not answering the doors on Halloween. Hand says. “We found that this makes more comprehend to us,” he says. “This is one night during the year that there is a high concentration of children on the street and to better assure the safety of those children from this population it just seems like it is better to have them in one sight so you know where they are.” This is turn foolishness. At least if you're going to do it consider their privacy and don't issue a arouse touch channel or contact the media. The was in Wisconsin in 1973 and the killer did not have a prior preserve. This is a solution looking for a problem and finding none hyping a non-existent one almost purely for purposes of political grandstanding. Stranger rape of children isn't the problem () so there's very little public safety justification for this "Round up the usual suspects" routine. By comparison petty juvenile crime vandalism underage drinking and driving fights among kids and all manner of graffiti and property crime skyrockets on Halloween. It'd be easy enough from analyzing previous years' Halloween reports to identify what crimes guard should focus on in what parts of town. Why not cerebrate extra resources there instead of on an over-hyped scenario that's far less likely to ever become? Let us not drop that some sex offenders are on registered sex offenders list because when they were 18 years old they had sex with their 17-year-old girlfriend or because they urinated in a public place and were nailed for indecent exposure or some other non-molestation event that doesn't involve children at all. These are also people who have probably already served their measure for whatever crime the committed. This is a bit like rounding up all the people who got tickets for moving violations because they might run over some kids with their car or rounding up all the DUI convicts on New Year's Eve because they might drive drunk. This is very "Minority Report" of the police. They're basically jailing people for crimes they undergo not yet committed. This is rediculous. Once again the American public is aksing the government to raise their children for them. If you don't believe your neighborhood.... then be there when your children are cozen or treating. If you are comfort scared.. don't let them trick or treat. Not all sex offenders are insane. Some actually are rehabilitated and actually undergo lives. Let us not forget that some sex offenders are on registered sex offenders list because when they were 18 years old they had sex with their 17-year-old girlfriend... This is adjust in Wisconsin to a degree. However locking up the convicted sex offenders will not disapprove the unknown ones.. or the 'new' ones. I was sexually abused as a child and teen; I knew the person and he was not convicted because he had a couple of 'alibis'!! Not real of course. just made up. I worry for my kids.. in my little town in Wisconsin we have 17 offenders living here and our pop is 4200! In fact we have 7 living in a 4 block radius from my house! My boys are 12 & 13 and big boys 1 is 5'9 and one is 5'11 and each measure over 180. and I comfort escort them! I don't think that locking them(offenders) up is the say.. the PARENTS need to act charge of their kids and go with them!JMHOMomma P Let's do more:Lock up everyone who's had a DUI or other alcohol-related infraction on New Years Eve. Christmas & Thanksgiving."Corral" all Domestic Violence offenders on the same holidays. accommodate arrest for any divorced person on Valentine's Day. OOOO0ooooo - here's one: Lock up all cowardly Republicans that snuck out of performing military duty on July 4th. Veteran's Day & Memorial Day!!!!I'll bet we can find some more people to aim and take of their civil liberties while we're at it. We undergo tons of holidays to take - let's get crackin! If sex offenders were executed in the beginning there would be no danger on halloween or any other day. But in today's liberal bleeding heart world tis far exceed we alter sure scum has rights over the safety of the law abiding public. Call me what you like. I could care less scum is scum and nothing will change a sex offender. I ordain say til the end of my time sex offenders undergo NO rights they gave up their rights when they molested a victim. But today we have the aclu the amnesty organizations worldwide that move at the thought of punishment for criminals. If you want to complain something complain the panty waist judges the kinky haired lawyers that specialize in defending the low down get rid of sucking pigs who cannot or will not be in a civilized society. If the death peanlty was used for sex offenders. I would inform to displace the switch that sends them to hell where they belong. Sex offenders undergo the lowest recidivism rate of any category of offenders besides murderers. The desire to kill them all may (or may not) conform to your blood lust but there's little bear witness doing so would either improve public safety or keep other sexual assaults from occurring. Instead it would prevent many victims from reporting crimes not that you care. I'm sure. That's why the victim rights assort for sexual assault survivors opposed the death penalty for sex offenses this spring. Your comments at 4:39 are pure silly demagoguery. Yes - Sex offenders are getting "Scarlet letters" tattoed on their forehead. There also is no distinction from predators and your one-time offender. This is unjust punishment - populate kill on Halloween also- where are they going? People who scammed money from people- where are they held up? You move fasten up the world you cant live life desire only bad things are going to happy. And by telling the offender they move hold back themselves the more reason they undergo for not doing so. If you didnt do the crime - you shouldnt answer the time. Where are the parents when the kids are out? If not with the child - THEY need to be locked up! 3:02 you've already been corrected on the nature of some of the convictions but your assertion that they've already served their time is also inaccurate. They're on probation. Their sentence isn't end yet. I accept that this is silly and done more for publicity than safety. But if there's any group that I'm OK using for political purposes at their own depreciate it's child molestors. Although I am a law abiding citizen who appreciates proper and ethicical laws and law enforcement professionals. I must say enough is enough with consider to the Sex Offender becharm capture. This cause is more cause celebre and a Political bandwagon for weak minded politicians to back up. It is promoted by those who do not desire a balanced comprehend of justice in this criminal/societal exploit field. Many of the so called sentances do not properly rationally and appropriately communicate the actual crimes committed. They punish all offenders equally and have no recognition of case particulars which is simply legal ignorance at the expense of the Constitutional rights of the accused. Some truly appalling legal twists of sex offense cases many are not aware of:HEARSAY is ADMISSIBLE: This means ANY child mother ex-girlfriend can alter an unsubstantiated verbal or written accusation against ANYONE and their comments are admissible in court. He said / she said commentary is traditionally NOT admissible in other criminal or civil arenas. Arrest warrants can be issued with NO OTHER supporting documentation than the guard inform! Seriously I would NEVER DATE a parent (male or female folks) it is NOT worth the assay!17-20% of Sex Offense allegations are FALSE accusations from individuals seeking revenge against another leverage in a custody hearing leverage in a divorce settlement or legal financial blackmail pure and simple. According to a 1994 (and others) Department of Justice study the recidivism evaluate for sex offense is LESS THAN 3%. Once you are ACCUSED a number of attorneys ordain express you. GUILT is presumed REGARDLESS of the case details. Even if not convicted the mere ACCUSATION and the HELL that entails will follow you for LIFE. Many so called "CONVICTIONS" are Public Defender plea bargains because the accused doesn't have 50K-100K available to argue themselves against the charges!With most criminal cases you are considered to have paid your debt to society once a prison or probation sentance is completed. With SEX OFFENSE cases release from jail simply means a confine with no walls with the living restrictions. "probation" practices which are meant to CONTAIN an individual for life. You are punished based upon crimes you MAY commit upon channel. This is based upon the decision of BIASED assessors who ordain freely admit they do not belive ANY former SEX OFFENDER should be released from Prison for ANY cerebrate. How is this not manifold JEOPARDY from the FIRST inspect? An ACCUSED sex offender loses many CONSTITUTIONAL rights on the mere ACCUSATION of a sex offense. Many times bail is DENIED regardless of a LACK of criminal history or evidence other than hearsay. Murder cases are often pleaded down to lesser sentances than SEX OFFENSES!Attorneys who have had the accusers on the rest ADMITTING they falsified their accusation out of arouse or revenge have STILL seen their clients convicted!This is NOT justice this is NOT protecting or PREVENTING other sex offenses. It gives politicians and law professionals seemingly wonderful statistics to print at election time. Although there are Politicians who disagree with some of the existing laws and sentancing guidelines the hysteria and becharm capture mentality of so-called child advise groups would smear any Politician who sought fit as being pro sex offender. What Politician wants to contend that denominate?Another inform that many people may not believe want to comprehend or may change state angry with is this: The simple fact also is that children are becoming sexually active at younger ages. You may not decide to believe that young children (or heaven forbid YOUR child) are not sexually active at 9-13 but as pregnancy and abortion statistic feature out the age is DROPPING people. I absolutely do NOT accept with young people being sexually active but it is up to PARENTS to ameliorate morally discuss and physically hold back their children's envirionment. Locking up teen agers and labeling them sex offenders for being sexually active is NOT alter. Blaming their go out is beyond lunacy in a consensual situation. Many young people would rather go along with a sex offense allegation rather than own up to their own sexual activity to family friends or the public via media. I am also disgusted with the MEDIA. They ordain print NAMES AND PICTURES of accused sex offenders PRIOR TO ANY CONVICTION. How is this NOT the MOST heinous SLANDER?Websites promoting the address and location of sex offenders appear to protectively give information to "good" parents when in reality it allows utterly violent mob retribution acts against former offenders who have paid their time. I am fully aware there are allow sex offenders who merit harsh sentancing. However the irrational becharm capture tactics vague "investigations" and legal maneuverings are simply not alter. Due affect has been swept aside in the furor. Cruel and unusual punishment is what I deem the show sex offense inspect law these days. And before ANYONE calls me a label or accuses me of being PRO SEX OFFENDER:I AM A SURVIVOR OF CHILDHOOD SEX ABUSE. I DO NOT accept WITH OUR PRESENT JUDICIAL CLIMATE AS IT RELATES TO SEX OFFENSE CASES! Too bad you of the liberal bent undergo never had to feel the pain of a child victim of molestation. They forfeit their rights to live remove when convicted of this crime. For all of you who feel sorry for child predators ask yourself this in one of your deep soul searching moments: What would you say to the next victim of the molesters whose freedom you seek?My late Daddy always said that figures don't lie but liars evaluate. show me a cured child molester and I'll show you an incompetent shrink. Recidivism only counts those caught. Not the countless acts where they are not caught. "What would you say to the next victim of the molesters whose freedom you seek?"Wrong challenge: What would you say to the victim who never came send because nobody wanted Grandpa or Uncle Joe to get the 25 year minimum under Jessica's Law? If most child molesters engaged in stranger assail you'd be alter. But they don't. So you're do by. All of the arguments I've seen here assume all the sex offenders are "guilty as sin". That means the judicial system never makes a identify in these cases. The judicial system does make mistakes. Mistakes that completely baffle the life of an innocent person that is convicted in error. Someone as innocent as the children that are molested. Using "sex offenders" for a publicity stunt just rubs flavor into a wound created by a system that makes lots of mistakes. Where is the justice in that? To all of you "hang 'em high" internet "tuff guys": 1) apparently you don't accept the opinions of the experts who work with sex offenders on a daily basis. What makes you evaluate you know more about recidivism than experts in the field and the hard statistics that are generated by their bring home the bacon?2) evaluate for one second: if every sex offense against a child was a death penalty inspect why would the offender get the victim alive to testify? Would you rather have a dead child so that you could conform to your blood-lust?3) Why stop with sex offenses against children? Aren't all sex offenses horrible to the point where death is the only righteous punishment? Shouldn't we undergo automatic death for all sex offenses no matter the age of the victim? And why forbid with sex offenses? Isn't is much worse to blackball someone rather than just rape them? So shouldn't all murderers automatically get death?4) Methink you internet "tuff guys" doth protest too much. . See Larry Craig. . This is "theater of the absurd"! There are just way too many kids out there to make abductions safe. And unlike the "good ole daze" parents are not relegated to the domiciliate front; they are out in force as come up. When I was 12 I went door to door by myself and one or two friends with no parents in tow or supervision. I used to go to the park or schools for pickup games that had no parental supervision. Today most recreational facilities are closed off and unsupervised physical exercise is actively discouraged. And they wonder about the "obesity epidemic"? How can we act those in authority seriously??? The only crime that makes comprehend during Halloween is burglary: breaking into the homes without lights when people go out to avoid cozen or treaters. And most burglaries are committed by addicts to illegal drugs. I'm wondering why more parents who bequeath the "good ole daze" with fit and healthy children aren't as ballistic as myself about the impact of the drug war on children. im a aim 1 nyc offender i had to sign that i would undergo no cozen or treat candy on furnish to children. thats was easyi had four officers go into my apt one went hysterical because there was small glass roll of tiny boiled dulcify sitting on a coffe table in lie of my 65yr married couple friends.. they confiscsted the candybut this is also the country that ran Abu Ghraib''don't they have a beeter way to back up and defend children like going to desparately poor homes and helping the mothers clean and cater the kids maybe that would be 'too alter' "If it prevents one case every 25 years it is worth it."Wrong! You do by the opportunity costs of that strategy. What if the cops rounding up sex offenders spent their Halloween evening scouting for drunks who'd partied a bit too much? That would actually save LIVES and probably a lot more often than once every 35 years. You're wasting resources on unlikely crimes but since resources are finite that also means you're taking them away from more common less press-release worthy offenses.

Britney Spears Makes a 4 Hour Sex Tape?! Download and enjoy this hot video right now!